Madras High CourtCMA(MD)/485/2017dismissed as infructuous

Thangamani v. Rengapriya

2020-11-09Honourable Mr Justice N. Kirubakaran,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

C.M.A.(MD)No.485 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI C.M.A.(MD)Nos.485 and 491 of 2017 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.5169 and 5205 of 2017 C.M.A.(MD)No.485 of 2017 Thangamani ... Appellant Vs.

Rengapriya ... Respondent Prayer:Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Court Act read with Order 43 Rule 1 of C.P.C. against the fair and decreetal order dated 06.04.2017 in I.A.No.169 of 2016 in H.M.O.P.No.640 of 2014 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Trichy. For Appellant : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondent : Mr.D.Selvanayagam C.M.A.(MD)No.491 of 2017 Thangamani ... Appellant Vs.

Rengapriya ... Respondent Prayer:Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of Family Court Act against the fair and decreetal order dated 06.04.2017 in I.A.No.170 of 2016 in H.M.O.P.No.640 of 2014 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Trichy.

For Appellant : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondent : Mr.D.Selvanayagam COMMON JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by N. KIRUBAKARAN, J.] The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that both the appeals have been preferred as against the order of interim maintenance awarded by the Trial Court. Now, the final https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.M.A.(MD)No.485 of 2017 order has been passed in H.M.O.P.No.640 of 2014 and therefore, the interim maintenance got merged with the final order. Hence, both the appeals have become infructuous.

2. In view of the above, both the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ogy Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To The Judge, Family Court, Trichy.

C.M.A.(MD)Nos.485 and 491 of 2017 09.11.2020 SSS(CO) KM (19.11.2020) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2