Haja Mydeen v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01/10/2024 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
1. Haja Mydeen,
2. Senthil,
3. Thennarasan, ... Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 to 4 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Kumbakonam Forest Range Police Station, Thanjavur District.
(W.L.O.R 03/2024).
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karunanithi, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of B.N.S.S. U/s 439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- To enlarge the petitioner / accused on bail pending investigation in W.L.O.R No. 03/2024 on the file of the respondent 1/5
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.08.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 2(2)(11), (14), 39(b), 43(1)(2), 49B, 50 and 51 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 in WLOR.No.03 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners herein were illegally found in possession of Rhinoceros unicorns. Hence, the complaint.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police.
4. Considering the nature of allegations in this case that the petitioners were said to be in possession of rhinoceros unicorns and considering the arguments made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the same is an old one and is already certified to be in possession of the petitioners by the Forest Department of the State of Maharashtra and even though this Court adjourned the matter twice for verifying the same, the learned Additional Public prosecutor submitting that the same is likely to take some time. In view thereof since the petitioners are in custody from 27/8/2024, 2/5
I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. (i) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; (ii)the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (iii)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness; iv)the petitioners shall not abscond during trial. v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial 3/5
Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. vi)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 01/10/2024 / TRUE COPY / 01/10/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (CO ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
trp TO
1. The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur.
2. Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjore District @ Kumbakonam.
3. The Officer in charge, Sub Jail, Thanjavur.
4. The Inspector of Police, Kumbakonam Forest Range Police Station, Thanjavur District.
5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.16035 of 2024 Date :01/10/2024 RK (01/10/2024) 5P / 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5