← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20202/2021dismissed

R.Suriyapandi v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-04-04Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.20202 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/04/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.20202 of 2021 R.Suriyapandi ... Petitioner/Accused 1 Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Superintendent of Police Office, Ramanathapuram.

Cr.No.30 of 2021.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.SIVAPRAKASH.S, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.E.ANTONY SAHAYA PRABAHAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.30 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A.1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.11.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, in Crime No.30 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons had promised to secure a job for the de-facto complainant and received Rs.1,60,000/- each from the de-facto complainant and victim and later, they cheated. Hence, the complaint.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that it is a clear case of job racketing and that the petitioner has received Rs.3,20,000/- from the de-facto complainant and victim. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he has paid Rs.20,000/- and he is not in a position to pay the remaining amount.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.20202 of 2021 5.Since the petitioner has expressed his readiness and willingness to settle the issue and also considering the period of incarceration, this Court has granted interim bail to the petitioner for a period of two months vide order dated 17.12.2021. But admittedly, the petitioner has not chosen to settle the amount as agreed by him.

6.Considering the seriousness and gravity of the offence alleged and also the quantum of amount involved and also the fact the petitioner has not chosen to pay the amount as agreed by him, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 04/04/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.II, RAMANTHAPURAM.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.20202 of 2021 Date :04/04/2022 SA/SVR/SAR.1/11.04.2022/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2