R.M.Kakrthikeyan v. The Principal Secretary To

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 13.12.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P(MD)No.1825 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD).No.1567 of 2016 R.M.Karthikeyan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

4.Mr.Jeyachandran, The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvarur, Thiruvarur District.

5.Mr.Deivam The Inspector of Police, Devadanapatti Police Station, Theni District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating

to the proceedings of the Impugned order in Na.Ka.No.199054/Crime 3(1) 2015 dated 30.11.2015, on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action against the 4th and 5th respondents based on the petitioner's complaint dated 25.09.2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for R1 to R3 : No appearance R4

ORDER

This Writ petition has been filed against the proceedings of the Impugned order in Na.Ka.No.199054/Crime 3(1) 2015 dated 30.11.2015, on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action against the 4th and 5th respondents based on the petitioner's complaint dated 25.09.2015. 2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that one Ibrahim made a complaint against the petitioner and the same was registered in Crime No.233 of 2013 and also another complaint has been laid against the petitioner in Crime Nos.28 of 2012 and 338

of 2013. Now, in all the cases, the investigation is completed and final reports have also been filed before the concerned Court and the trial is yet to commence. In the said circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks relief before this Court.

3.At this juncture, this Court feels that the petitioner's grievance can be addressed only after the result of the trial proceedings. It is open to the petitioner to file appropriate application after the outcome of the trial proceedings. 4.In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

13.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No sbn

To

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

sbn W.P(MD)No.1825 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD).No.1567 of 2016 13.12.2023