K.Sowntharrajan v. The Thasildar
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.Crl.(MD) No.1116 of 2025 K.Sowntharrajan ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Thasildar, Thasildar Office, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Aranthangi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
3.V.Karuppaiah 4.V.Periyasamy 5.V.Muthaiah
...Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take appropriate steps to grant permission to conduct the Vinayagar Sathurthi Festival (Santhana Kappu, Special Pooja, Annathanam) and screening Hindu Spiritual cinema movies scheduled to be screened on 27.08.2025 by our Kammankadu villagers to the Sri Sakthi Vinayagar Temple situation at Kammankadu Revenue Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District by 1/5
considering the representation, dated 14.08.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman for M/s. Kbs Law Office For R1 : Mr.F.Deepak Special Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhian Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R3 to R5 : Mr.T.T.Nishanth
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to Mandamus, to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take appropriate steps to grant permission to conduct the Vinayagar Sathurthi Festival (Santhana Kappu, Special Pooja, Annathanam) and screening Hindu Spiritual cinema movies scheduled to be screened on 27.08.2025 by our Kammankadu villagers to the Sri Sakthi Vinayagar Temple situation at Kammankadu Revenue Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District by considering the representation, dated 14.08.2025.
2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), on instructions, would submit that the representation made by the petitioner was considered and rejected by the second respondent, dated 26.08.2025 and the copy of the 2/5
rejection order is also produced before this Court.
3. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and has made an endorsement to that effect.
4. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the above said rejection order, if so aggrieved. No costs. 03.09.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Indu 3/5
To 1.The Thasildar, Thasildar Office, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Aranthangi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
Indu W.P(MD).No.1116 of 2025 03.09.2025 5/5