← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/22162/2023dismissed

Jose Antony.A v. The Deputy General Manager (Lpg)

2026-02-02Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY A.Jose Antony ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Deputy General Manager (LPG), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Southern Region, "Indian Oil Bhavan", No.139, Mahatma Gandhi Road, (Nungambakkam High Road), Chennai - 600 034.

2.The Chief Area Manager, Indane Area Office, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., No.2, Race Course Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai - 2.

1/5

3.The Sales Officer, Manager LPG Sales, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., No.3/9, T1 Muthamizh Apartment, 5th Main Road, Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli - 627 011.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to restore the petitioner's license based on the award passed by the Hon'ble Arbitrator bearing No.57 dated 01.10.2019 declaring the termination is bad in law.

For Petitioner : Mr.SC.Herold Singh For Respondents : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff,

O R D E R

The present Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus, to direct the respondents to restore the petitioner's license based on the award passed by the Hon'ble Arbitrator in Award No.57 dated 01.10.2019 declaring the termination as bad in law. 2/5

2.A perusal of the averments and the records shows that the termination has been declared as bad. Hence, the right course available to the petitioner for restoration of the petitioner's license is to file an Execution Petition before the execution court. 3.Learned Counsel for the respondents would submit that even the arbitration award says that the license need not be restored. However, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that arbitration award does not speak about restoration of the petitioner's license, though it has declared the termination as bad in law.

4.Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that if the petitioner is having any right based on the arbitration award passed in Award No.57 dated 01.10.2019, the petitioner shall file an Execution Petition before the Execution Court and execute the award.

3/5

5.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed, with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. 02.02.2026 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No MR 4/5

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

MR 02.02.2026 5/5