M.Duraichamy v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Duraichamy ... Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The Block Development Officer, Palani.

3.The President, Kanakkanpatty Panchayat, Kanakkanpatty, Palani Taluk.

4.Mr.Senthil Arasu, Vice President, Kanakkanpatty Panchayat, Kanakkanpatty, Palani Taluk ... Respondents 1/4

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider representation of the petitioner dated 04.01.2016 and for bearing the fourth respondent from acquiring the petitioners land, which is situated in Kanakkampatti Village, Palani Taluk, Dindigul in S.No.511/4 for forming the road and give further any other order.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for the issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider representation of the petitioner dated 04.01.2016 and for bearing the fourth respondent from acquiring the petitioners land, which is situated in Kanakkampatti Village, Palani Taluk, Dindigul in S.No.511/4 for forming the road.

2/4

2. When the Writ Petition is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advocate submits that the respondents has not laid any road in the petitioner's land.

3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed as no further order is required. No costs.

22.02.2023 tta NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The Block Development Officer, Palani.

3.The President, Kanakkanpatty Panchayat, Kanakkanpatty, Palani Taluk.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

tta 22.02.2023 4/4