← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18995/2022allowed

Purushothaman v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-03-23Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.03.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1.Purusothaman 2.Narayanan ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 Vs.

1.State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Vathalai Police Station, Trichy District.

In Crime No.25 of 2021 ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Sathyanarayanan ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.25/2021 dated 11.01.2021 on the file of the 1st Respondent and Quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash Babu For R1 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.M.Chandra Bose 1/4

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.25 of 2021 dated 11.01.2021 on the file of the 1st Respondent and Quash the same.

2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.25 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) of IPC against the petitioners. 3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they 2/4

accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 05.12.2022, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in Crime No.25 of 2021 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded. 6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.25 of 2021, pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order. 23.03.2023 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No Indu 3/4

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

Indu To 1.The Inspector of Police, Vathalai Police Station, Trichy District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Order made in Dated: 23.03.2023 4/4