Mohamed Iliyas @ Mohamed Iliyas Rahumadullah v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.12.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR 1.Mohamed Illiyas 2.Jahira Banu ... Petitioners/A1 & A2 Vs.

1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Karur District.

(Crime No.19 of 2022) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Dinesh ... 2nd Respondent/De-facto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to Crime No.19 of 2022 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Karur and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Mathiyalagan For R1 : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R2 : Mr.C.Bharathi 1/4

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.19 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as illegal. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the second respondent has lodged a complaint about the incident alleged to have been occurred on 01.08.2022 against the petitioners and that FIR came to be registered in Crime No.19 of 2022, for the offences under Sections 120B, 468 and 420 IPC on the file of the first respondent Police. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent would submit that investigation is pending. 4.Meanwhile, the parties have decided to burry the hatchet and compromised their dispute among themselves amicably. In pursuance of the said compromise, they have filed a joint compromise memo. 2/4

5.The petitioners as well as the second respondent are present before this Court and they are identified by their counsel as well as by the first respondent Police. On enquiry, before this Court both parties have accepted the compromise between them and filing of joint compromise memo. Hence, the compromise memo is recorded. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the nature of the charges levelled against the petitioners and also taking note of the fact that the parties have entered into compromise and filed joint compromise memo and recording of the same, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the case pending. 7.In the result, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.19 of 2022, on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed.

13.12.2022 Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No sji 3/4

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

sji To 1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Karur District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Order made in Dated: 13.12.2022 4/4