Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20827/2021allowed

Balamurugan v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-01-25Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20827 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20827 of 2021 1.Balamurugan 2.Marudhu Manikandan @ Manikandan 3.Kalarani ... Petitioner / Accused Nos.1 to 3 vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Subramaniapuram Police Station, Madurai City.

(Crime No.610 of 2019) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Sundaraprakash ...2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and quash the case in S.C.No.365 of 2021 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Satish Rajkumar For R1 : Mr.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.J.Yesusubananth

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings in S.C.No.365 of 2021 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Madurai.

2. The defacto complainant Sundaraprakash is present in person before this Court. He has been duly identified by Thiru.M.Arumugam, SSI of Police attached to C2 Subramaniapuram Police Station, Madurai. The defacto complainant categorically states before this Court that he has no objection for quashing the impugned proceedings. Since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, no purpose will be served in keeping the impugned proceedings alive. The parties have also filed a joint compromise https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20827 of 2021 memo. The impugned proceedings are quashed. The Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmi Enclose Copy of Joint Compromise Memo.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Subramaniapuram Police Station, Madurai City.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.E.SATISH RAJKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-2449[F] dated 25/01/2022 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20827 of 2021 25.01.2022 RK(09/02/2022) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2