Pandy, v. The Commissioner,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.16460 and 16461 of 2016 Pandy ... Petitioner versus The Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipality, Sivakasi.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned Tender Notification in Na.Ka.No. 761/2016/A4 dated 16.11.2016 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondent to issue a fresh and proper tender notification.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For Respondent : M/s.S.Devasena 1/4

ORDER

This writ petition is filed as against the Tender Notification issued by the respondent in the year 2016.

2. Today, when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondent submit that even before the filing of this writ petition, a work order was issued and the work has also been completed.

3. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.12.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To The Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipality, Sivakasi.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 12.12.2023 4/4