Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/1946/2021dismissed

Parameswari v. The Superintendent Of Police

2022-02-10Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian,Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar2 pages

H.C.P.(MD) No.1946 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR H.C.P.(MD) No.1946 of 2021 Parameswari ... Petitioner/Mother of Detenue Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ervadi Dharga Police Station, Ervadi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.Sundaram 4.Ananthi 5.Arun ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the petitioner's daughter namely, Anusha, D/o.Late. Balakrishnan, aged about 18 years before this Court and set her at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Anantha Murugan For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

AND N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

The petitioner seeks production of the person of her daughter Anusha, aged about 18 years.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

H.C.P.(MD) No.1946 of 2021

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

3. Mr.S.Ravi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, upon instructions, would submit that the detenue has eloped with the fifth respondent and got married and moving in and around Bangalore. Despite the efforts taken by the Police, they are not able to trace the whereabouts, as they are in move.

4. As the detenue is a major and said to have been eloped with the fifth respondent, we do not find any illegal detention, hence, this Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CSI) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rm Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ervadi Dharga Police Station, Ervadi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CCtoM/s.S.M.ANANTHA MURUGAN, Advocate(SR-5423[F]dated 10/02/2022 ) ORDER MADE IN H.C.P.(MD) No.1946 of 2021 10.02.2022 PKP/25.02.2022/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2