Vincent @ Arockiasamy Vincent v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13/09/2023 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN 1.Vincent @ Arockiasamy Vincent 2.Piyoola @ Beula Gnana Christa ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 Vs The State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
Crime No.192 of 2023.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.A.ARUN PRASAD, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.R.SURESH KUMAR, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.192/2023 on the file of the Respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) I.P.C., in Crime No.192 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory 1/4
bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have invested money on the advice of the defacto complainant to one Anthony Dhanraj, when the petitioners demanded the same, there was wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, in which, the first petitioner said to have attacked the defacto complainant with hands. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they did not commit the alleged offence. In order to evade from giving money to the petitioners, the defacto complainant has given the false complaint.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioners.
5. Considering the nature of offence, the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) 2/4
each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 13/09/2023 / TRUE COPY / /09/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
INDU TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUMAYAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
3/4
+1 CC to M/s.A.ARUN PRASAD, Advocate ( SR-13607[I] dated 13/09/2023 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.16561 of 2023 Date :13/09/2023 SA/DD/SAR. /21.09.2023/4P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 4/4