← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/22912/2021dismissed as infructuous

Wilson Gnanadoss v. Authorised Officer

2022-09-14Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan,Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14/09/2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P(MD)No.22912 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.19378 and 19380 of 2021 Wilson Gnanadoss ... Petitioner Vs.

Authorised Officer, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned sale notice dated 23.11.2021 issued by the respondent Authorised Officer, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank, Tirunelveli, quash the same and consequently directing the respondent to adhere the statutory procedure laid down in the SARFAESI Act and Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.T.Thevan Standing Counsel * * * 1/3

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition, challenging the Sale Notice dated 23.11.2021, issued by the respondent Authorised Officer, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank, Tirunelveli, and consequently directing the respondent to adhere the statutory procedure laid down in the SARFAESI Act and Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

3.

Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 14/09/2022 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sj 2/3

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD , J.

sj W.P(MD)No.22912 of 2021 14/09/2022 3/3