Madras High CourtWP(MD)/23701/2018dismissed as infructuous

A.Radhakrishnan v. The Secretary To Government

2025-06-12Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.Maria Clete6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE A.Radhakrishnan Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-09.

2. The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai-09.

3. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600009.

4. The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department., Secretariat, Chennai-09.

5. The Secretary to Government, Tourism Culture & Endowments Department., Secretariat, Chennai-09.

1/6

6. The Commissioner of Land, Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-05.

7. The Director of Survey, And Settlements, Chepauk, Chennai-05.

8. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-28.

9. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai-34.

10. The District Collector, Ramanathapuram.

11. The Sub Divisional Executive, Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram.

12. The Inspector General Of, Police, South Zone, Madurai.

13. Thiru.Subramania Shanmuga Sivakumar, Previous Special Tahsildar, Temple Lands, Madurai, Now Working as Personal Assistant to Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Campus, Madurai.

14. The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Ramanathaswamy Temple, Rameshwaram.

Respondent(s) 2/6

For Petitioner(s) M/s:

A.Radhakrishnan (Party-in-person) For Respondent(s) M/s:

Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader for R1 to R11, R13 Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor for R12 Mr.S.Ramesh for R14 PRAYER :- To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take appropriate action on the basis of 11th respondent report dated 13.02.2018 as well as by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2018.

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.) The learned Government Pleader appearing for the tenth respondent would submit that the project had already been implemented and commenced its operation. Thus, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. 3/6

2. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

[S.M.S.,J.] & [A.D.M.C.,J.] 12.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No 3/4 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PKN To