← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/1734/2018closed

S.Manickavalli, v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-10-22Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on : 15.04.2019 Pronounced on : 22.10.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI H.C.P(MD)No.1734 of 2018 S.Manickavalli ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3.Murugan 4.Ramakrishnan ... Respondents [R.4 suo motu impleaded vide order dated 21.01.2019] Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to produce the body or person of the detenu / petitioner's daughter, namely, Ramana Devi, D/o.Sevugan, aged about 19 years from the illegal custody of the third respondent and set her at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.G.Arun Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Chandrasekaran Additional Public Prosecutor for R.1 & R.2 Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy for R.4 Mr.Veera. Kathiravan Senior Counsel Amicus Curiae

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.) The petitioner is the mother of the detenue, namely, Ramana Devi, aged about 19 years and according to her, her daughter / the 1/3

detenue is Working at Coimbatore and she came to their house on 05.11.2018 for Deepavali and on 10.11.2018, she was found missing. On enquiry, she came to know that the third respondent herein has kidnapped her daughter and therefore, the petitioner has lodged a complaint before the second respondent Police on 18.11.2018 and the same was treated as petition enquiry in C.S.R.No.155 of 2018. Alleging that the second respondent Police has not acted upon the said complaint, the petitioner has filed the present Habeas Corpus Petition.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the detenue was produced before this Court and on enquiry, she would state that she is a major and on her own volition, she has left the parental home and married the third respondent on 14.01.2019.

3. The third respondent, who is present before this Court, also stated that he and the detenue are lovers and they got married on 14.01.2019, in the presence of a Sangam, namely, fyg;g [j ;jpUkzk; g[hpe ;njhh; eyr;rq ;fk ; at Coimbatore.

4. The petitioner, who is present before this Court, is also been aware of the statements made by the detenue. However, she questioned the legality of the marriage performed by the Sangam.

5. Be that as it may, since the detenue is a major and according to her, she, on her own volition, has left the parental home and married the third respondent, this Court does not find any illegal detention / custody.

6. Hence, this Habeas Corpus Petition is closed, as no illegal detention is made out and the detenue is set at liberty, enabling her to take a call as to her own future and well being. Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) gk To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station, Sivagangai District.

2/3

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Pre-Delivery orders made in H.C.P(MD)No.1734 of 2018 22.10.2019 al(CO) TR(22.11.2019)3P 4C 3/3