M.Pandiaraj, S/O. Mariappan, v. The District Collector,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.06.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Pandiaraj ... Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector,

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

3. The Thasildar, Tharamgampatty, Karur District.

4. The Village Administrative Officer, Thevarmalai, Karur District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to dispose of the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A4/3020/2010, 1/4

dated 20.06.2012.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate

ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 05.06.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 06.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To

1. The District Collector, 2/4

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

3. The Thasildar, Tharamgampatty, Karur District.

4. The Village Administrative Officer, Thevarmalai, Karur District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 06.06.2023 4/4