Pavithra, D/O. Late. Nagarajan v. The District Collector,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 13.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Pavithra ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Tahsildar, Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd (ACTCL), Periyakulam, Theni District.

3.The Municipal Commissioner, Periyakulam Municipality, Periyakulam,Theni District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.12.2015 For Petitioner : no representation For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Government Advocate 1/4

ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 10.02.2023 there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the case was directed to be listed on 13.02.2023 under the caption for dismissal.

2.Accordingly this writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. When the case was taken up for hearing in the morning there was no representation and it was passed over. Even when the case is called in the after noon for the second time, there is no representation for the petitioner, despite the case is listed under the caption for dismissal. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

13.02.2023 Internet : Yes / No dsk 2/4

To 1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Tahsildar, Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd (ACTCL), Periyakulam, Theni District.

3.The Municipal Commissioner, Periyakulam Municipality, Periyakulam, Theni District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

dsk 13.02.2023 4/4