S.K.Matheena Beevi v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.K.Matheena Beevi ... Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector, Pudukottai.

2. The Tahsildar, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

3. Chokara Beevi ... Respondents (third respondent is impleaded vide order dated 08.03.2016 in W.M.P(MD)No.2868 of 2016) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.01.2016 to remove the illegal occupation of the petitioner's pathway land in accordance with law.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.L.Prabhu For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Kannan, Additional Government Pleader For R3 : No appearance

ORDER

The petitioner is a widow and she had an grievance that her neighbour one Chokara Beevi, W/o.Beer Mohammed, has been illegally occupying a pathway and preventing her from having ingress and egress to her property. In this regard, she made a representation to the second respondent. Since the said representation was not considered by the second respondent, she is before this Court.

2. The petitioner claims that the pathway is her individual pathway and that has been obstructed by the third respondent.

3. Since the issue with regard to the pathway, the petitioner shall work out her remedy before the competent Civil Court by filing a 2/4

necessary suit.

4. With such liberty, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 09.02.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To

1. The District Collector, Pudukottai.

2. The Tahsildar, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 09.02.2023 4/4