Anitha v. Selvan

in Crl.R.C.(MD)SR.No.32186 of 2025 SHAMIM AHMED, J.

Heard Mr.R.Karunanidhi, learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2.Mr.R.Karunanidhi , learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case.

3.The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order, dated 29.08.2025, had passed the following order:

"Notice to the respondent returnable by 26.09.2025. Private notice is also permitted.

2.Post on 26.09.2025."

4.As per the Office report, dated 25.09.2025, notice has been served on the respondent. The learned Counsel for the petitioner produced the proof of service and the notice thorugh private mode has been served on the respondent. However, when the matter is being taken up for hearing today, neither the respondent nor any Counsel representing the respondent appeared before this 1/3

Court today. Thus, it appears that the respondent is not interested to pursue this delay condonation application.

5.Being satisfying with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 22 days in filing the above Criminal Revision Case is condoned.

6.Office is directed to number the Criminal Revision Case, if it is otherwise in order, forthwith.

13.10.2025 cmr 2/3

SHAMIM AHMED, J .

cmr 13.10.2025 3/3