J. Kopperuncholan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.03.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD)No.4302 of 2016 J.Kopperuncholan ... Petitioner vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Director of School Education, Office of the Directorate of School Educational Department, College Road, Chennai.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Office, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

4.The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Office, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.

1/6

5.The Administrator, M.K.N. Madarasa Trust, Adirampattinam, Thanjavur District.

6.The Secretary, Khadir Mohideen Boys Higher Secondary School, Adirampattinam, Thanjavur District.

7.The Head Master, Khadir Mohideen Boys Higher Secondary School, Adirampattinam, Thanjavur District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 5th respondent in his proceedings No.Nil, dated 29.02.2016 and to quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.H,Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For R1 to 4 : Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate *****

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order, dated 29.02.2016.

2/6

2.The contention of the petitioner is that without issuing any charge memo, he was directed to appear before the enquiry officer to conduct the enquiry. The petitioner apprehending that he will not be granted sufficient opportunity in the enquiry proceedings has approached this Court.

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that pending writ petition, the petitioner was terminated. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the Administrator who was appointed as Administrator by the orders of the Court. The Administrator had heard the petitioner's grievances and had reinstated the petitioner. After reinstatement, the petitioner is continuing in his service and till now, he is in service. 4.Therefore, nothing survives for adjudiciation. Hence, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous 3/6

petition is closed.

5.The learned Counsel appearing for respondents 6 and 7 submitted no instructions before this Court and filed a memo to that effect. The said submission is recorded.

Index : Yes / No 28.03.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No Tmg 4/6

To 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Director of School Education, Office of the Directorate of School Educational Department, College Road, Chennai.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Office, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

4.The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Office, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg 28.03.2023 6/6