← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/1165/2025dismissed

S.Rangasamy v. The Superintendent Of Police

2025-08-28Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Rangasamy ... Petitioner versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul,

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police,

3. The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police, ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with the impugned order in e/f/vz;/20nth/fh/t/-2025 dated 17.08.2025 on the file of the Respondent No.3 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents to grant 1/4

permission for perform the "Sri Vinayagar Chaturthy" from 27.08.2025 to 29.08.2025 at 21 places at Vedasandur and also immerse the said Idols through a procession on 29.08.2025 from 4 p.m. onwards at Vedasandur Town with the police protection in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajaselvan For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 17.08.2025, in and by which, the petitioner has been granted permission to conduct Vinayagar Chaturthy procession on 30.08.2025.

2. The petitioner seeks permission to conduct Vinayagar Chaturthy procession on 29.08.2025.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that they are facing several law and order problem. Therefore, depending upon the 2/4

available police force, they have granted permission to the petitioner to conduct Vinayagar Chaturthy procession on 30.08.2025. He further submits that they are supposed to deploy police force for some other Vinayagar Chaturthy processions.

4. In view of the law and order concerns, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 17.08.2025.

5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. 28.08.2025 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul,

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, 3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

3. The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police,

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

28.08.2025 4/4