S.Ramachandran v. The Inspector General Of

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 02.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Ramachandran ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai.

2.The District Registrar, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Sub-Registrar, Kadayanallur, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.12.2015 and 11.01.2016 within the time stipulated.

For Petitioner : No representation For Respondents : Mr.M.Ramesh, Government Advocate 1/3

ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 27.02.2023 there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the case was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal.

2.Accordingly this writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. When the case is taken up for hearing there is no representation for the petitioner, despite the case is listed under the caption for dismissal. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

02.03.2023 Internet : Yes / No dsk To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai.

2.The District Registrar, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Sub-Registrar, Kadayanallur, Tirunelveli District.

2/3

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

dsk 02.03.2023 3/3