Madras High CourtWP(MD)/637/2016disposed as infructuous

M/S.Veeraa Construction And v. The District Collector

2023-02-10Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.02.2023 CORAM :

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD) Nos.637 & 638 of 2016 and WMP(MD) Nos.513 to 516 of 2016 W.P(MD) Nos.637 of 2016:

M/s. Veeraa Construction and Enterprises, Rep by its Managing Partner, M.Sathyaseelan.

Petitioner Vs.

Respondents 1/5

W.P(MD) Nos.638 of 2016:

M/s.KRN & Co., Rep by its Managing Partner, K.R.N. Ramesh Petitioner Vs.

Respondents COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned e-tender notice issued by the second respondent in his proceedings Se.Ma.Tho.E.6031.Tender/2015, dated Nil published in Dinamani Newspaper on 23.12.2015 and quash the same as illegal and in violation of Provisions of Tamilnadu Transparancy in Tenders Act 2/5

1998 and Rules 2000 and consequently directing the second respondent to treat the condition to produce certificate of list of machineries to be certified by the Executive Engineer of the Rural Development Department in the District as per Clause 6 of the Information and Construction for Bidders under Two Cover System of the invitation for technical bid NABARD RIDF - XXI-2015-16 in respect of the Improvements and Construction of Bridge Works for the packages No.2,3 & 5 in Pudukottai District under NABARD RIDF - XXI-2015-16, as directory and not mandatory. For Petitioner :Mr.D.Kirubakaran For Respondents :Mr.T.Vilavankothai Additional Government Pleader (In both Wps) C O M M O N O R D E R These writ petitions are filed as against the e-tender notice issued by the second respondent in his proceedings Se.Ma.Tho.E.6031.Tender/2015, published on 23.12.2015. 2.Today(10.02.2023), when these matters are taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the prayer sought for by the petitioners in these writ petitions has now become infructuous.

3/5

3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

10.02.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No vrn To 4/5

B.PUGALENDHI, J vrn Common Order made in W.P(MD) Nos.637 & 638 of 2016 and WMP(MD) Nos.513 to 516 of 2016 10.02.2023 5/5