Madras High CourtWP(MD)/23202/2021dismissed

Venkatesh V v. The Inspector General Of Police

2022-01-03Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN V.Venkatesh ... Petitioner -Vs1.The Inspector General of Police, O/o. the Inspector General of Police, South Zone, 2.The Commissioner of Police, O/o. the Commissioner of Police, 3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, O/o. the Deputy Commissioner of Police, 4.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thallakulam Sub-Division, Madurai.

5.The Inspector of Police, O/o. The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station, 6.Madasamy 7.Arumugam 8.Gubendran ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 & 6 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.11.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Peer Mohamed For R1 to R5 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.)

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (crl.) appearing for R1 to R 5. 1/3

2. The petitioner states that he lodged a complaint before the fifth respondent and that it is not being acted upon. Therefore, the petitioner wants the respondents 1 to 4 to take action against the fifth respondent. The fifth respondent has also been named in person.

3. The petitioner claims that he borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- from the seventh respondent by pledging his car along with the original RC book. His grievance is that even though the said amount was repaid, the seventh respondent has not returned the car along with the original RC book.

4. I called upon the petitioner's counsel to produce proof of such repayment. No such proof is forthcoming. In the typed set of papers also, except enclosing the complaint copy dated 12.11.2021, no other proof has been enclosed.

5. I therefore cannot fault the fifth respondent for not registering any FIR. Leaving open the petitioner's other rights and remedies, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmi Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Inspector General of Police, O/o. the Inspector General of Police, South Zone, 2.The Commissioner of Police, O/o. the Commissioner of Police, 3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, O/o. the Deputy Commissioner of Police, 2/3

4.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thallakulam Sub-Division, Madurai.

5.The Inspector of Police, O/o. The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station,

6. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

03.01.2022 MMS(CO) GC(11.01.2022) 3P 7C 3/3