K.Vijayan, v. The District Collector,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.04.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN K.Vijayan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Madurai Division, Madurai.

3.The Commissioner, Oddanchatram Municipality, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 13.07.2018 against the third respondent's notice dated 20.09.2017, within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Palanichamy For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.J.Parekhkumar Standing Counsel Page No. 1 of 3

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner appears through Video Conferencing and submits that the relief sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous in the light of the subsequent development.

2. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

04.04.2024 Index : Yes/ No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order smn2 To 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Madurai Division, Madurai.

3.The Commissioner, Oddanchatram Municipality, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District.

Page No. 2 of 3

C.SARAVANAN , J.

smn2 04.04.2024 Page No. 3 of 3