Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6761/2016dismissed

Y.Solmon Devaraj, v. The District Revenue Officer

2023-02-15Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)Nos.5828, 5829 of 2016 Y.Solmon Devaraj ... Petitioner v.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy.

3.The Tahsildar, Tiruchirappalli East, Trichy.

4.Singam @ Muthukrishnan 5.Suriah Begum 6.Sasikala Devi 7.Palanisamy 8.P.Venkatachalapathy 1/6

9.P.Kumar 10.P.Gurunathan 11.J.Govindarajan 12.Sri Sabari Mills, Amalgamated Coal Fields Ltd., K.Sattanur Village, K.K.Nagar, Trichy.

13.S.P.N.Sathiyamoorthy S.P.Natarajan T.S.No.5400, Marthndapuram, Second Street, Puthukottai Town, Pudukottai District.

14.Ethirajammal 15.Thilakar 16.Nirmala 17.Dhanalakshmi 18.T.Vinoth ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in connection with the impugned orders of the respondents 1 & 2 in Na.Ka.Aa6/20251/2015 2/6

dated 03.03.2016 and Na.Ka.A7/6903/2012, dated 28.08.2015, respectively and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.T.Vilvankothai, Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.E.D.Prakash for R.4 *****

ORDER

The petitioner filed this writ petition challenging the proceedings of the respondents 1 & 2 in Na.Ka.Aa6/21251/2015 dated 03.03.2016 and in Na.Ka.A7/6903/2012 dated 28.08.2015, respectively, in and by which, the District Revenue Officer and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy, passed orders for grant of patta in favour of one Singam @ Muthukrishnan / fourth respondent herein.

2.When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that after the orders passed by the District Revenue Officer and the Revenue Divisional Officer, the District Collector, 3/6

Trichy, has conducted a detailed enquiry, pursuant to a direction issued by this Court in WP(MD)No.17214 of 2018, dated 02.08.2018 and has passed an order in Na.Ka.AA6/21251/2015, dated 15.07.2019. 3.It appears that the petitioner has already preferred a revision petition before the District Collector, who, in turn, by order dated 15.07.2019, has confirmed the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and the District Revenue Officer. The District Collector has further observed that the petitioner has purchased the property from the persons, who are not having any right over the property.

4.In view of the subsequent developments, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / No 15.02.2023 Internet : Yes / No gk 4/6

To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy.

3.The Tahsildar, Tiruchirappalli East, Trichy.

5/6

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

gk 15.02.2023 6/6