Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8074/2016dismissed as infructuous

K.Pandiyan, Revenue Assistant v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2022-08-22Honourable Mr Justice G. Chandrasekharan6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.08.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN W.M.P(MD).No.6596 of 2016 K.Pandiyan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Additional Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

4.The District Revenue Officer, O/o.The Collectorate, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.

1/6

5.S.Chakkarapandiyan 6.V.S.Chandrasekar 7.A.Chinnasamy ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A3/623/2015 dated 03.03.2016 and quash the same as illegal insofar as the respondents 5 to 7 are concerned and consequentially to direct the official respondents to post the petitioner as Revenue Inspector in the light of Clause 9 of the Annexure IX r/w 38(b)(ii) of the Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service Rules. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4 Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy for R6 and R7 No-appearance for R5 2/6

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A3/623/2015 dated 03.03.2016, quash the same as illegal insofar as the respondents 5 to 7 are concerned and direct the official respondents to post the petitioner as Revenue Inspector in the light of Clause 9 of the Annexure IX r/w 38(b)(ii) of the Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service Rules.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner got promotion as Revenue Inspector and participated in the Training. 3/6

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also concedes the submission of the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

22.08.2022 Internet: Yes Index :Yes/No ssb 4/6

To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Additional Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

4.The District Revenue Officer, O/o.The Collectorate, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.

5/6

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.

ssb 22.08.2022 6/6