Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9187/2016dismissed as infructuous

Telc Boarding, Chettiappan v. The Registrar,

2020-01-30Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy,Honourable Mr Justice T. Ravindran2 pages

W.P(MD)No.9187 of 2016 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN W.P(MD)No.9187 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.7320 of 2016 TELC Boarding, Chettiappan Nagar, Angu Nagar & Vilangammai Nagar Kudiyeruppor Nala Sangam, Paramakudi, represented by its President, S.Ramasamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Registrar, District Registrar Office, Sivagangai District. 2.The Sub Registrar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The President, Kremmer Sandegren Foundation Pattukkottai, D.No.21, Bishop Kulatheru, Puthur, Trichy - 17.

4.A.Palaneelamegam ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in respect of Power of Attorney, dated 04.04.2016 (Pending Document No.42) executed by the third respondent in favour of the fourth respondent relating to S.Nos.79/1, 79/2 of Vendhoni Village (New T.S.No.3/1 & 3/2 of Paramakudi Municipality) and quash the same and consequently, direct the second respondent not to register any document on the basis of the aforesaid power deed.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Baalasundharam For Respondents : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate for R.1 & R.2 Mr.I.Sam Jegan for R.3 Mr.A.R.Kannappan for R.4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P(MD)No.9187 of 2016

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.DURAISWAMY,J.] Since the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai, vide Letter No.41530/U1/2017, dated 08.11.2017, had withdrawn the Circular No.67, dated 03.11.2011, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the present writ petition has become infructuous. Further, the learned Counsel submitted that liberty may be given to the petitioner to challenge the document in question before the competent civil Court in accordance with law.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the document in question before the competent civil Court in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P & A) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Registrar, District Registrar Office, Sivagangai District.

2.The Sub Registrar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

+1 CC to M/s.Special Govt.Pleader ( SR-4302[F] dated 31/01/2020 ) W.P(MD)No.9187 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.7320 of 2016 30.01.2020 rsb SDS (11.02.2020) 2P-4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2