Baskar v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.03.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4385 of 2023 Baskar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State Rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, Eruvadi Police Station, Tirunelveli District, 2.Muthukrishnan.M .... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in pursuant to the proceedings in CC.No.38 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, and QUASH the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan For R1 : Mr.S.Manikandan Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.R.Jenifarbibin

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the charge sheet in CC.No.38 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri.

1/4

2.The contention of the petitioner is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.128 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 355, 506(2) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, against the petitioner. It appears that there is a small issue between the parties.

3.The further contention of the petitioner is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioner and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels.

4.The petitioner and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded. 5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 20.03.2023, this Court is of the opinion that no 2/4

useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending and inclined to quash all further proceedings in CC.No.38 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, in respect of the petitioner. 6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in CC.No.38 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioner alone. The compromise memo is recorded and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order.

20.03.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No tta To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Eruvadi Police Station, Tirunelveli District, 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

G.ILANGOVAN, J., tta Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4385 of 2023 20.03.2023 4/4