← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9560/2016dismissed as infructuous

Ramco Industries Limited, Rep v. The Chairman,

2023-02-16Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.7605 of 2016 Ramco Industries Limited, Rep. by its Company Secretary and Sr. General Manager (Legal) Plot No.A-12, Sipcot Industrial Centre, Gangaikondan, Tirunelveli District - 627 352 ... Petitioner in versus

1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO Tirunelveli E.D.C., TNEB/Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli - 627 011.

3. The State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. (SIPCOT) Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

1/5

4. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, (Marshalls Road), Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

... Respondents in Prayer in W.P.(MD)No.9560 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned demand notice issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in TEDC/TIN/AO/R/F/ACCD/D40/2015 dated 27.04.2015 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the regulations of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code 2004 and direct the 2nd respondent to adjust the excess amount paid towards additional current consumption deposit in the monthly bill of the petitioner. Prayer in W.P.(MD)No.9561 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned demand notice issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in TEDC/TIN/AO/REV/CCD/D33/2015 dated 26.04.2016 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the regulations of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code 2004.

2/5

For Petitioner in : Mr.M.Rajaraman For Respondents in both W.Ps.

: Mr.S.Deenadhayalan COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in both the writ petitions have become infructuous and therefore, both the writ petitions may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, both the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

16.02.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

3/5

To

1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO Tirunelveli E.D.C., TNEB/Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli - 627 011.

3. The State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. (SIPCOT) Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

4. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, (Marshalls Road), Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

4/5

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 16.02.2023 5/5