Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21321/2023dismissed as infructuous

Sugandhi v. The Superintendent Of Police

2023-11-27Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.11.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

1. Sugandhi

2. Natchimuthu

3. Ayyappan ... Petitioners Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul.

3. K.Saminathan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court, to direct the R1 to instruct the R2 not to interfere in the Civil dispute by unnecessarily harassing the petitioners and their family members illegally under the guise of enquiry.

For Petitioners : Mr. Sades Kumar.S For Respondents: Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4

ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to instruct the second respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute by unnecessarily harassing the petitioners and their family members illegally under the guise of enquiry.

2.The grievance of the petitioners is that originally the petitioners are the power of attorneys to the property mentioned in the complaint. Based on the power of attorney, it was sold to the third respondent in the year 2010. Thereafter, the third respondent is in possession and enjoyment of the property by changing the revenue records in his name. Suppressing the same, a complaint was registered by the third respondent as against the petitioners. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit based on the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry was undertaken and during the course of enquiry, both parties appeared and the petitioners also executed a sale deed in respect of some other property in favour of the defacto complainant/third respondent. In view of the above said settlement, the said complaint was closed.

2/4

4.In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. 27.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/ No PNM To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

G.ILANGOVAN, J.

PNM ORDER IN 27.11.2023 4/4