Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20517/2018dismissed for default

S. Isac Rathina Raj, v. The Director General Of Police

2021-11-30Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.11.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018 S.Isac Rathina Raj .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director General of Police, South Zone, Madurai.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Junction Palam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

4.Stanley Sargunam .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the wrong doer, the 4th respondent by restraining him from using the premises for illegal purposes and against public peace, in Survey Nos.852, 853, comprises 928.12 sq. ft. and 20 cents of vacant site situated in T.S.Ward No.11, Veeraragavapuram, East Street, Tirunelveli, based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2018. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Sivakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

(This writ petition is heard through video conference) This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the wrong doer, the 4th respondent by restraining him from using the premises for illegal purposes and against public peace, in Survey Nos.852, 853, comprises 928.12 sq. ft. and 20 cents of vacant site situated in T.S.Ward No.11, Veeraragavapuram, East Street, Tirunelveli, based https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018 on the petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2018. 2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.11.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner and the third respondent was present before the Court in person and submitted that the petitioner appeared before the Enquiry Officer and gave an undertaking to workout their remedy through civil proceedings. Based upon that it came to be closed. Since there was no representation for the petitioner on that day, the case has been ordered to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal' 3.Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Since the representation came to be closed on the basis of the undertaking and there is no representation for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Director General of Police, South Zone, Madurai.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Junction Palam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018 30.11.2021 SAR(CO) KB(03.01.2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2