Madras High CourtWA(MD)/1766/2023dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution Corporation v. Vvd And Sons Pvt. Ltd.,

2024-03-01Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar,Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :01.03.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and C.M.P(MD)No.13457 of 2023

1. The Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution Corporation, Limited (TANGEDCO), Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Superintending Engineer Solar Energy, Non-Conventional Energy Sources (NCES), Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd (TANGEDCO), 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 02.

3. The Superintending Engineer Virudhunagar Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Virudhunagar.

4 The Superintending Engineer Tuticorin Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Tuticorin. ... Appellants/Respondents

Vs.

VVD and Sons Private Limited, Represented by its Executive Director Mr.D.Kabilan, Registered office at No.182, Palayamkottai Road, Thoothukudi - 628 003. ... Respondent/Petitioner PRAYER : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, against the order dated 12.07.2022 made in W.P(MD)No.6958 of 2017. For Appellants :Mr. Veera Kathiravan, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For Respondent :Mr.Arun Anubumani

JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.] The appellants have filed this writ appeal challenging the order, dated 12.07.2022 made in W.P(MD)No.6958 of 2017.

2. When the writ appeal is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the appellants, has fairly conceded

before this Court that the issue involved in this writ appeal is no longer res integra in the light of the decision already rendered by this Cout in W.A.No.213 of 2022 etc., batch dated 22.12.2023.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent has also not refuted the said submission made by the learned Additional Advocate General. He has also stated that following the aforesaid judgment, this writ appeal may be dismissed.

4. In the light of the above, this writ appeal stands dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [D.K.K., J.] [R.V., J.] 01.03.2024 Index :

Yes / No PM

D.KRISHNAKUMAR , J.

and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

PM 01.03.2024