The Assistant Manager v. Chandrasekaran

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.13445 of 2022 The Assistant Manager, (Shriram Chits Tamilnadu Pvt. Limited) rep. by R.Balasubramanian.

No.1858, Sougth Main Street, Thanjavur, (Wrongly mentioned as The District Manager, Sriram Chits, Thanjavur in the cause title in the petition before the Lower Court and there is no post) ... Petitioner/2nd Accused Vs.

1.Chandrasaekaran ... Respondent/Petitioner 2.The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Thanjavur.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur.

... Respondents/Respondents 4.The Managing Director, Sriram Chits, Chennai.

(Wrongly mentioned in the cause title in the petition before the Lower Court and there is no post) 1/4

5.Sriram Chits Agent (Wrongly mentioned in the cause title in the petition before the Lower Court and there is no post) .. Respondents/Accused Nos.1 & 3 PRAYER: This Civil Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records of the trial court order dated 15.09.2022 in Crl.MP.No.586/2022 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Thanjavur and set aside the same by allowing the Criminal Revision Petition.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.S.S.Madhavan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order that has been passed by the trial Court by referring the matter under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., for enquiry.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that on the basis of the above said reference, enquiry was undertaken by the respondent and during the course of enquiry, the complainant namely Chandrasaekaran has given a statement that a compromise was reached between the parties and the entire dispute has been settled between them. So no further action is required.

2/4

3.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), the prayer sought for in this petition become infructuous. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 11.11.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TM To 1.The I Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Thanjavur. 2.The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Thanjavur.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

G.ILANGOVAN,J.

TM 11.11.2022 4/4