← Library
Madras High CourtWA(MD)/2504/2025dismissed

The Administrative Secretary, Administrative Committee v. S.Jesu Jegan

2026-06-09Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice M.Jothiraman5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09.06.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and C.M.P(MD)No.14410 of 2025 1.The Administrative Secretary, Administrative Committee, Tirunelveli Diocese, 2.The Financial Administrator, Tirunelveli Diocese, ... Appellants/Respondents 5 & 6 Vs.

1. S.Jesu Jegan ...1st Respondent/Writ Petitioner

2. The Deputy Moderator Csi Synod, No.5, Whites Road, Indira Garden, Royapettah, Chennai.

3.The General Secretary (CSI) and Honorary Secretary (CSITA), No.5 Whites Road, Indira Garden, Royapettah, Chennai.

1/5

4.The Honorary Treasurer (CSITA and CSI), No.5 Whites Road, Indiar Garden, Royapettah, Chennai.

5. Rt.Rev. Dr.Argst Barnabas, Bishop, Diocese of Tirunelveli, Chairman/ Manager of the Colleges of Diocese, Under the Trustee T.D.T.A., Bishopstone, No.15, North High Ground Road, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District-627 002.

...Respondents 2 to 5/

Respondents 1 to 4 6.The Directorate of Collegiate Education No.577, Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

7. The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Tirunelveli Division,

8. District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli

9. District Educational Officer, Tenkasi.

10. J.Peter John

...Respondents 6 to 10 /

Respondents 6 to 10 PRAYER :- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P(MD)No.17382 of 2025, dated 23.07.2025. For Appellants : No appearance For R6 to R9 : Mr.S.Venkatesh Counsel for State 2/5

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) There is no representation on behalf of the appellants.

2. Aggrieved by the interim injunction granted by the learned Single Judge, respondents 5 and 6 in the writ petition have preferred the present writ appeal.

3.The appellants are at liberty to approach the learned Single Judge seeking vacation of the interim order and to advance their arguments. Therefore, we find no merit in the writ appeal. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 09.06.2026 Index : Yes / No : Ye / No am 3/5

To 1.The Directorate of Collegiate Education No.577, Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

2. The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Tirunelveli Division,

3. District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli

4. District Educational Officer, Tenkasi.

4/5

N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

am 09.06.2026 5/5