Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17546/2024closed

Ponnusamy v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-03-19Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :19.03.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17546 of 2024 Ponnusamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Superintendent of Police Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, Guziliamparai Police Station, Dindigul District.

3. Rajalingam

4. Subramani

5. Rajalingam

6. Jothi Basu

7. Sathiyamoorthi

8. Karuppasamy

9. Sathish Kumar

10. Kannan

11. Tamilarasan

12. Rajamanickam ... Respondents 1/4

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute and also not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry, based on the petitioner representation dated 01.10.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sivaram For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute and not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry, based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.10.2024.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2 would submit that they have not harassed the petitioner as alleged by him and there is a temple dispute in respect of conducting Festival for a particular period and already the said period was over. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication.

3. This Court heard both sides and also perused the records. 2/4

4. The representation of the petitioner is dated 27.09.2024, but the prayer is in respect of representation dated 01.10.2024 and there is no any such representation enclosed with this petition. However, the prayer of the petitioner is not to harass the petitioner and the respondent has also denied the alleged allegations. Therefore, recording the above said submissions of the learned Government Advocate, this criminal original petition is closed. 19.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Mac To

1. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, Guziliamparai Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

P. DHANABAL , J.

Mac 19.03.2025 4/4