Sulochani v. The Additional Chief Secretary To Government
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fifteenth day of November,Two Thousand and Nineteen PRESENT The Honourable Mr. Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN AND The Honourable Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH HCP(MD). No.1210 of 2019 (in the matter of the detenu viz. MADHAN @ MADHANKUMAR, MALE, SON OF RAJU, AGED 25/2019, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Sulochani (F-49 years) W/o Raju, Suruli Kovil Street, Tiruverumbur, Tiruchirappalli District.
... Petitioner(Mother of the Detenu) Vs
1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.
3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli.
... Respondents To R1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
R2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli District,Tiruchirappalli.
R3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli.
(With copies of petition and affidavit for each) Through
1. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADRAS-104. (Regarding the 1st Respondent)
2. The Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli. (Regarding the 2nd and 3rd Respondent) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (in duplicate, with copies for immediate service and return with covering letter)
Whereas upon Motion this day made unto this Court by Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian, Advocate for the petitioner, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for records pertaining to the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent made in his proceedings in Cr.M.P. No.61/2019 dated 01.10.2019 and quash the same and set the petitioner's son by name MADHAN @ MADHANKUMAR, S/O RAJU,aged about 25 years, at liberty from Central Prison, Tirucirappalli/3rd Respondent. Whereas this Court hath directed issue of notice, returnable by 16/12/2019(Monday, the Sixteenth day of December, Two Thousand and Nineteen) to the respondents 1 to 3 herein to show cause why this petition should not be complied with:
Now take notice that you, namely R1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
R2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli District,Tiruchirappalli.
R3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli.
The respondents 1 to 3 herein are hereby directed to appear in person or by an Advocate before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai at 10.30 a.m on 16/12/2019 (Monday, the Sixteenth day of December, Two Thousand and Nineteen) to show cause why this petition should not be complied with.
HEREIN FAIL NOT, WITNESS the Honourable Thiru AMRESHWAR PRATAP SAHI, The Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras on 15/11/2019(Friday, the Fifteenth day of November,Two Thousand and Nineteen). ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CS-II) ORDER DATED : 15/11/2019 HEARING DATE : 16/12/2019 NOTICE HCP(MD). No.1210 of 2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ VB(22.11.2019) 2P 7C