← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17219/2023disposed of

Dinesh v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-09-25Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 25/09/2023 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Dinesh Kumar ... Petitioner/Accused (Rank Not Known) Vs State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Madurai District.

Cr.No. Not known of 2023.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner :

Mr.Vishnu.V, Advocate.

For Respondent :

Mr.B.Nambiselvan, Additional Public Prosecutor. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not known of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 406, 420 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.Not known of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/3

2. The case of the prosecution is that one Selvendhiran was running RSV trading Private Limited and collected money from the defacto complainants on the guise of investing in trading and promised them, he will pay high rate of interest every month. He has collected money from various depositors by the false promise. The petitioner is the one who had introduced the complainant to the said Selvendhiran. When the depositors questioned the same about the non-payment of monthly interest, the accused persons prolonged the same by saying one or other reasons. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and is no way connected with alleged investments. The petitioner has also lodged a complaint against the said Selvendhiran and the same is still pending. The petitioner had appeared for enquiry and had produced all the relevant documents.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that there is an allegation of group level marketing issue, over which, one K.Muruganantham lodged a complaint against the petitioner and another namely Selvendiran, which is stated to be pending.

5. Considering the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, let the above said complaint be enquired within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any 2/3

trouble arises, the petitioner can workout his remedy through appropriate proceedings.

6. With the above said direction and liberty, this criminal original petition stands disposed of.

sd/- 25/09/2023 / TRUE COPY / /10/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Indu TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17219 of 2023 Date :25/09/2023 RS/DD/SAR-(06.10.2023) 3P 3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 3/3