Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19846/2022allowed

P.Jayalakshmi v. N.Subramanian

2024-02-23Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.02.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19846 of 2022 P.Jeyalakshmi ... Petitioner/Appellant Vs.

N.Subramanian ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER:- Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the returned Docket Order in Criminal Appeal S.R.No.1834 of 2022 dated 22.07.2022 on tehfile fo the Principal Sessions Judge, Karur, and consequently, direct the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur, to number the Criminal Appeal S.R.No.1834 of 2022.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokul Raj

ORDER

This petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 22.07.2022 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Karur, in Crl.A.S.R.No.1834 of 2022 and to further direct the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur to number the Criminal Appeal S.R.No.1833 of 2022.

1/4

2.The petitioner/accused is facing trial in C.C.No.724 of 2017 on the file of the Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level, Karur, filed under Sections 138 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act by the respondent/defacto complainant. After trial, the case was ended in conviction on 07.04.2022. Against which, the petitioner filed an appeal in Crl.A.SR.No.1834 of 2022 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., The learned Sessions Judge returned the same on 22.07.2022 and directed the petitioner to either recall the warrant before the trial Court or get suspension of sentence from the trial Court and prefer appeal. Challenging the same, the petitioner filed this petition with the above said prayer.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the trial Court has not issued any non-bailable warrant against the petitioner and the case was ended in conviction. Against which, she filed an appeal in Crl.A.SR.No.1834 of 2022 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur. The learned Sessions Judge ought to have entertained the appeal by numbering and considering for suspension of sentence. Even in the absence of petition for suspension of sentence before the trial Court, the trial Court has power to order for suspension with condition. However, the learned Sessions Judge has not entertained the appeal is not sustainable one. On the sole ground, the present petition has been filed.

2/4

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions, would submit that the petitioner is ready to deposit 50% of compensation amount imposed by the trial Court in C.C.No.724 of 2017 before numbering the appeal. 5.In view of the above, this Court is inclined to issue a following directions:- (i) The petitioner is directed to deposit 50% of the compensation imposed by the trial Court in C.C.No.724 of 2017 before numbering the appeal within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (ii) On such deposit being made, the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur, is directed to number the appeal. Thereafter, hear the petitioner as well as the respondent and pass appropriate orders.

6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. 23.02.2024 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No dss Note : The Registry is directed to return the original appeal papers in Criminal Appeal S.R.No.1834 of 2022 to the petitioner to present the same before the trial Court after substituting the Xerox copy of the same. 3/4

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

dss To The Principal Sessions Judge, Karur Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19846 of 2022 23.02.2024 4/4