Soundararajan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/11/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN
1. Soundararajan
2. Vigneshkumar
3. Sriram ... Petitioners/Accused Rank Known Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Koodalpudur Police Station, Madurai City (Crime No.167 of 2022). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Susi Kumar C, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.M.Veeranthiran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.167 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.167 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant is the head of Woman Self Help Group. On 20.04.2021, the de-facto complainant and eight others have borrowed loan for a sum of Rs.65,000/- from Equiters Small Hinduce Bank. Subsequently, they have paid the loan properly, one Maheswari, who is among nine members have not paid loan properly. Due to which, the employees 1/3
from the private bank have insisted the de-facto complainant to undertake the amount payable by Maheswari. But the de-facto complainant refused the same, on 06.05.2022 at about 12.00 p.m., the petitioners along with other accused trespassed into her house and threatened her with dire consequences and assaulted the de-facto complainant and her son with deadly weapons and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocents and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that the injured has treated as outpatient and no previous case is pending against the petitioners. However, considering the gravity of offence, he strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has treated as outpatient and the petitioners are not having any previous case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am until further orders.
(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the 2/3
learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 08/11/2022 / TRUE COPY / /11/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
sji TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODALPUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.19710 of 2022 Date :08/11/2022 RK/SSS/SAR-4(17/11/2022) 4P/5C 3/3