Muruganantham v. The District Collector
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP(MD)No.24213 of 2019 & W.M.P.(MD)No.20814 of 2019 Muruganantham
...Petitioner
vs.
1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.
2.The Special Officer / Block Development Officer, Thottiyam Panchayat Union, Thottiyam, Trichy District.
...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 1st respondent vide proceedings No.Nil dated Nil and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to appoint an eligible competent candidate to the post of Village Secretary to M.Puthur Village Panchayat, on the basis of interview conducted on 23.05.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vadivelan For Respondents : Mr.M.Jeyakumar for R2 Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader for R1 1/3
ORDER
After filing of the writ petition, selection process was completed and one Mr.Karthikeyan was appointed to the said post. Therefore, the prayer sought for in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the selection of Mr.Karthikeyan, in accordance with law.
2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 07.11.2025 Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Internet :Yes mbi To The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.
2/3
C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
mbi WP(MD)No.24213 of 2019 07.11.2025 3/3