Thangam v. The Sub-Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of February Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.M.BASHEER AHAMED CRL OP(MD) No.1630 of 2017 THANGAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNAVASAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT (CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.THIYAGARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2.The learned Government Advocte(Crl.side)appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry alone is pending.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent Police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side),the respondent Police is directed to register an FIR or close the enquiry as expeditiously as possible and the respondent Police should not harass the petitioner during enquiry and the petitioner shall cooperate with the enquiry.

5.With the above observations, this Criminal Original petition is closed.

sd/- 15/02/2017 / TRUE COPY / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar(C.S.)

TO 1 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANNAVASAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KEERANUR +1cc to M/S.A.THIYAGARAJAN,ADVOCATE SR.No. 8764

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1630 of 2017 Date :15/02/2017 KK-PM-PN-SAR2-23.02.2017-2P-4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/