Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/5026/2017disposed of

M.Veerarmu v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-04-28Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.5026 of 2017 M.VEERARAMU ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAMADURAI POLICE STATION, MANAMADURAI CRIME NO. 50/2017 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.VELLAICHAMY Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1, in Crime No.232 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 306 of I.P.C. and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court had already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD) No.2846 of 2017, vide order dated 15.03.2017 on condition that the petitioner shall execute sureties within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. But the petitioner could not execute the sureties within the time prescribed by this Court. Hence, the petitioner has come up with this petition for anticipatory bail.

3. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) affirms the above said fact.

4. This Court heard the submissions made on either side and perused the order passed in Crl.O.P(MD)No.2846 of 2017, dated 15.03.2017.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that this Court had already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.2846 of 2017, dated 15.03.2017 and also considering the fact that the petitioner is eking out her livelihood by selling flowers at Mattuthavani Busstand, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before Pudur Police Station, Madurai daily at 5.30 p.m. until further orders and she shall co-operate with the enquiry before the respondent police. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 28/04/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

GCG TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MANAMADURAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAMADURAI POLICE STATION, MANAMADURAI 4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.S.VELLAICHAMY Advocate SR.No.21749 GJM/BS/SAR-4-4.5.17-2P-7C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5026 of 2017 Date :28/04/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/