Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6985/2017disposed of

Manikandan v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-06-14Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN CRL OP(MD) No.6985 of 2017 MANIKANDAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.I Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERIODU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CRIME NO. 74 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.KARUNA Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner herein/1st accused who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.04.2017 for the alleged offence under Section Girl Missing @ 366(A), 52(A) IPC and 5(L) 6 of POSCO Act in Crime No.74 of 2017 on the file of the respondent/Police, seeks bail.

2.Based on the complaint given by one Subbiramani, this petitioner was arrested and detained. The defacto complainant is the father of the victim girl Vimala who has completed 17 years old. When the defacto complainant found that his daughter is missing in the morning on 15.03.2017, he preferred a complaint. The complaint was taken on file and First Information Report was registered on 23.03.2017 after investigation. The petitioner was secured by the respondent/Police on 01.04.2017 and remanded to judicial custody. 3.The case of the petitioner is that he and the victim girl were in love with each other for the past one year and she voluntarily eloped with him to solemnise marriage. 4.In the Accident Register, it is stated that 17 years old girl namely Ms.Vimala has eloped with Mr.Manikandan known to her for the past two years to Erode on 15.03.2017 and had sexual intercourse https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

with him with consent. The school Transfer Certificate of the victim girl shows that she was born on 20.01.2000. 5.Considering the rival submissions made by the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may be granted bail, subject to conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:- (i)The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, Dindigul District.

(ii)The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 14/06/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VEDASANDUR, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERIODU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

5 THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, DINDIGUL +1. CC to M/S.V.KARUNA Advocate SR.No.24385 NBI CSL/BS/SAR-II/19.06.2017 : 2P/7C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6985 of 2017 Date :14/06/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/