K.Thanga Pandi, v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.M.BASHEER AHAMED CRL OP(MD) No.8526 of 2017 1 K.THANGA PANDI, 2 MARESWARAN, 3 PALPANDI, 4 VELUMANI, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALLAN KINARU POLICE STATION, VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.P.SUBBIAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 to A4, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC., in Crime No.123 of 2017, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a election dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioenrs herein and the petitioners used filthy language against the defacto complainant and also made a threat with dire consequences and the investigation is still pending.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committee any offence, as alelged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the first petitioner is a student, studying Diploma in Ramu Seetha Polytechnic College, Karriyapatti and the other accused are construction workers.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that there are totally four accused in this case, who are the petitioners herein, arrayed as A1 to A4 respectively. there was a election dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioners herein and the petitioners used
filthy language against the defacto complainant and also made a threat with dire consequences and the investigation is still pending.
5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudhunagar, on condition that the petitioners shall execute each a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required, for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 06/07/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO I VIRUDHUNAGAR, 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALLAN KINARU POLICE STATION, VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.P.SUBBIAH Advocate SR.No.25997
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.8526 of 2017 Date :06/07/2017 MPK SVA/CM/MSA/10.07.2017/SAR1/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/