Madras High CourtCRL RC(MD)/450/2017dismissed as infructuous

Mc. C. Radhakrishnan v. Mr.Dhanunadha Babu

2021-04-23Honourable Mr Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup2 pages

Crl.R.C.(MD) No.450 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.04.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.R.C.(MD) No.450 of 2017 C.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs.

1.Dhanunadha Babu 2.Bhagiyanadan 3.Johnson 4.Selvan 5.The Inspector of Police, Land Grabbing, Nagercoil Police Station, Kottaru, Kanyakumari District.

... Respondents/Respondents Prayer:- This Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397(1) r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in Cr.M.P.No.526 of 2016 dated 15.03.2017 order passed by the Special Court for Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli and set aside the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For R1 to R4 : Mr.A.Mohamed Haneef for Mr.M.P.Senthil For R5 : Mr.A.P.G.OHM.Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed to set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.526 of 2016, dated 15.03.2017 by the learned Special Judge for Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli. 2.When the matter came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 appeared through virtual mode and submitted that the petitioner herein had already instituted two suits before the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil and the respondents herein have also instituted a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.R.C.(MD) No.450 of 2017 suit before the very same Court.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that during the pendency of the suits, which were filed by the petitioner herein before the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil in the year 2010, the present revision case has been filed by the petitioner. Now, the learned trial Judge, after full trial, dismissed the suits filed by the petitioner. He would further submit that since the suits had been decided as against the petitioner, the petitioner does not want to proceed with the present case and the prayer sought for in this revision case had now become infructuous.

4.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) mm To The Special Judge for Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police Land Grabbing, Nagercoil Police Station, Kottaru, Kanyakumari District.

+1 CC to M/s.M.P.SENTHIL, Advocate ( SR-17207[F] dated 23/04/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate ( SR-17623[F] dated 27/04/2021 ) Crl.R.C.(MD) No.450 of 2017 23.04.2021 ES(CO) TR(17.05.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2