Sathiyakala @ Jenani, v. M.Prasath,
CRL.R.C.(MD) No.685 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP CRL.R.C.(MD) No.685 of 2017 Sathiyakala @ Jenani : Petitioner Vs.
M.Prasath : Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C. r/w. Section 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in M.C.No.159 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli, dated 01.06.2017 and set aside the same enhancing the monthly maintenance to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sivachandran ***
ORDER
When the matter was called, Mr.P.Sivachandran, learned Counsel for the petitioner, who appeared through virtual mode, submitted that the petitioner had filed this revision case seeking enhancement of maintenance amount and during the pendency of this revision case, the petitioner had contracted a second marriage. Therefore, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this revision case and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders. 2.This Court had directed the learned Counsel for the petitioner to file a memo to that effect and passed over the case by 01.30 pm. Thereafter, the learned Counsel for the petitioner sent a memo duly signed by him and the same is also recorded. 3.Based on the filing of the memo and the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
CRL.R.C.(MD) No.685 of 2017 Cmr Encl: Xerox copy of Memo.
To The Judge, Family Court, Tiruchirappalli.
Order made in CRL.R.C.(MD) No.685 of 2017 15.04.2021 VB(07/05/2021) 2P / 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2