← Library
Madras High CourtCMP(MD)/10809/2022allowed

Sakthivel, v. 1. Perumal (Died), 2. Dhanalakshmi,

2022-12-21Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.SOUNTHAR CMP(MD) No.10809 of 2022 1 SAKTHIVEL, POWER AGENT AND SON OF VASANTHARAYA PERUMAL, ALAGUPATTI VILALGE CUSPA, DINDIGUL TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

... PETITIONER(S) Vs 1 1. PERUMAL (DIED), 2. DHANAL AKSHMI,, W/O. RAMKUMAR, DOOR NO. 102, 7TH BLOCK, M.M.D.A. MADURAVAYAL, CHENNAI TOWN.

2 DHANALAKSHMI, W/O. RAMKUMAR, DOOR NO. 102, 7TH BLOCK, M.M.

D.A. MADURAVAYAL, CHENNAI TOWN.

3 JEEVA, W/O. LATE. PERUMAL, NEAR TEMPLE CITY, AMOGAM NAGAR, EAST STREET, THANDIKOMBU, DINDIGUL DISTRICT - 624 709.

4 NAGARAJ, S/O. LATE. PERUMAL, NEAR TEMPLE CITY, AMOGAM NAGAR, EAST STREET, THANDIKOMBU, DINDIGUL DISTRICT - 624 709.

5 KALEESHWARI, D/O. LATE. PERUMAL, NEAR TEMPLE CITY, AMOGAM NAGAR, EAST STREET, THANDIKOMBU, DINDIGUL DISTRICT - 624 709.

... RESPONDENT(S) ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 105 days in filing the petition, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent and also to bring on record the proposed respondents 3 to 5 as the legal representatives of deceased first respondent.

2. The proposed parties / legal representatives of first respondent were served and their names appeared in the list. There is no representation for the proposed legal representatives.

3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in these affidavits filed in the support of these petitions, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions stand allowed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the causetitle.

5. Post the second appeal for final disposal on 20.01.2023. btr 21/12/2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis