Elangovan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29/09/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL Elangovan, ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The Inspector of Police, Kabisthalam Police Station, Thanjavur District.
(Crime No.518/2023).
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.ARUNRAJ.K, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.R.SURESH KUMAR, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime no.518/2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.09.2023 for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(a) r/w 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, in Crime No.518 of 2023, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 16.09.2023, when the police party was on their routine check up, they found the petitioner having possession of 15 numbers 1/4
of 180 ml. of brandy liquor bottles. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against him and he is in custody from 16.09.2023 and thereby bail may be granted to him.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) would submit that the petitioner is having possession of 15 numbers of 180 ml. Brandy liquor bottles. He has no previous case, however, strongly objected to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both side and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions on either side, considering the nature of offence, no previous case is pending against the petitioner and also considering the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:
[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam and on further conditions that:
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 A.M. for a period of thirty days, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. 2/4
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 29/09/2023 / TRUE COPY / 29/09/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TM TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PAPANASAM.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.
3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, THANJAVUR.
3/4
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KABISTHALAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.K.ARUNRAJ, Advocate ( SR-14443[I] dated 29/09/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17498 of 2023 Date :29/09/2023 SA/SAR. /29.09.2023/4P/7C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 4/4